Monday, July 4, 2011

Casey Anthony and Hare's Checklist: Part Two

In an earlier post, we examined the first ten items in Dr. Robert Hare's twenty-point psychopathy checklist.  All ten could be connected to the personality and behavior of Casey Anthony.  Now here are the second group of points for consideration.

Promiscuous Sexual Behavior: a variety of brief, superficial relations, numerous affairs, and an indiscriminate selection of sexual partners; the maintenance of several relationships at the same time; a history of attempts to sexually coerce others into sexual activity or taking great pride at discussing sexual exploits or conquests.

Casey has a long list of conquests including a string of one-night stands around the time that Caylee was conceived.  Some she only knew by first names.  It is no surprise that Casey cannot tell us who Caylee's father is.  She used Anthony Rusciano mercilessly, leaving him feel like dreadful when she rose from his bed and walked out without a word.  She had a string of overlapping, serial relationships--still having sexual relations with Rico Morales as she transitioned to Tony Lazzaro.

 
Early Behavior Problems: a variety of behaviors prior to age 13, including lying, theft, cheating, vandalism, bullying, sexual activity, fire-setting, glue-sniffing, alcohol use, and running away from home.


No know evidence of these problems in Casey Anthony.


Lack of realistic, long-term goals: an inability or persistent failure to develop and execute long-term plans and goals; a nomadic existence, aimless, lacking direction in life.

Casey couldn't even manage to stick it out long enough to graduate from high school.  She expressed an interest in photography and her father tried to help her get into school to study, she dropped that ball without looking back.  She hadn't worked for years and led an empty life filled with parties and sex without an apparent thought for tomorrow.


Impulsivity: the occurrence of behaviors that are unpremeditated and lack reflection or planning; inability to resist temptation, frustrations, and urges; a lack of deliberation without considering the consequences; foolhardy, rash, unpredictable, erratic, and reckless.

She murdered Caylee without having a plan to dispose of the body.  She hid her pregnancy without a thought for her ability to conceal it forever.  She lived her life one day at a time, making up one lie after another to buy time before the inevitable revelation of Caylee's death.


Irresponsibility: repeated failure to fulfill or honor obligations and commitments; such as not paying bills, defaulting on loans, performing sloppy work, being absent or late to work, failing to honor contractual agreements.

She lost her job by not showing up. She didn't not graduate from high school by being absent.  She did not work to pay her bills, preferring to steal from others including her parents, friends and elderly grandparents.


Failure to accept responsibility for own actions: a failure to accept responsibility for one's actions reflected in low conscientiousness, an absence of dutifulness, antagonistic manipulation, denial of responsibility, and an effort to manipulate others through this denial.

It was always someone else's fault.  It was the high school's fault that she did not graduate.  It was George, Lee and Cindy's fault that she lied.  It was an accident that Caylee died.  It was Roy Kronk's fault for dumping the body in the woods.  She was a victim, she insisted, not a perpetrator.


Many short-term marital relationships: a lack of commitment to a long-term relationship reflected in inconsistent, undependable, and unreliable commitments in life, including marital.

Casey bounced from one relationship to another, although engaged, she'd not ever been married.  Her interpersonal relationships with her family members were mercurial, more like that of a 13-year old than that of a young woman in her twenties.



Juvenile Delinquency: behavior problems between the ages of 13-18; mostly behaviors that are crimes or clearly involve aspects of antagonism, exploitation, aggression, manipulation, or a callous, ruthless tough-mindedness.


Casey Anthony did not have a juvenile record. Her manipulation of others, however, was clearly evident as was her habit of lying about everything and nothing at all.


Revocation of condition release: a revocation of probation or other conditional release due to technical violations, such as carelessness, low deliberation, or failing to appear.


Casey Anthony did not violate conditional release when she was out on bail on the check theft charges.  She did not have the opportunity to do so after she was charged with murder because she was never released on bail.


Criminal Versatility: a diversity of types of criminal offenses, regardless if the person has been arrested or convicted for them; taking great pride at getting away with crimes.


Repeated theft from parents, grandparents and friends. False statements to the police. Suspected homicide of a child.

Casey Anthony easily meets the definition in seven of these final ten points.  That gives her a positive response on 17 out of 20 of the items.  However, taking it a step further, scoring each point on a scale of 0-2.  By my calculation, that would give her a total score between 32 and 38.  A diagnosis of psychopathy is met when the subject scores 30 points or more.

I am not a mental health professional, but it seems clear to me that Casey Anthony fits the diagnosis.  It explains why Caylee Marie Anthony is now dead.

14 comments:

  1. Hello, Dianne. You have an excellent blog. I found you through Peter and Heather's blog, Statement Analysis.

    Under the category of Criminal Versatility, I think it is fair to add both child neglect and child abuse. Because the murder charge is (obviously) the most serious, I think we all forget about an important issue that slips through the cracks. What the heck did Casey do with her daughter for (approximately) two years every time she was "with Zanny"?

    Caylee was certainly being neglected and abused prior to her murder. These episodes have never been accounted for.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Glad you're enjoying my blog. I do know that she took Caylee to some parties where drugs and alcohol were being used. I know there were instances where she was careless with Caylee's safety. I don't what else she did but you are probably right.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I recently found your blog and have learned a lot about important cases. I've enjoyed reading backwards and appreciate all the hard work that you do to keep up such high quality blog posts! To add to your description under Irresponsibility, Lee has stated that he initially intended to sell his car (the Firebird)but that Casey talked him into selling it to her. She made the 1st two payments and never paid him another penny! When George & Cindy originally purchased the car, Lee paid them back and took over all the on-going payments and paid the car off early. That was a big red flag to me that Casey's freeloading/stealing behaviors go way back!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pleased to hear you enjoy and appreciate my blog.
    If we worked on it, we could probably build a list of irresponsibility examples several pages long

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for another insightful and informative post. Casey Anthony is quiet a piece of work. I can only imagine what it was like to live with her.

    It was chilling to watch her yesterday as her own words came back to bite her. The level of anger and hate that was present on her face spoke volumes. It makes me wonder what she'll do if the jury comes back with a guilty verdict. It seems to me she is a ticking time bomb.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I really think that most of the time, she believes that her lies are going to extricate her from this situation.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If she is found guilty do you think she will hang her hopes on appeals to keep the charade going? Also, will you be writing a sequel/follow up to your book, "Mommy's Little Girl"?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm sure she'll want to pursue an appeal if there is a guilty verdict. But I doubt it has much chance of success. At some point, the publisher would like to release and expanded edition of MOMMY'S LITTLE GIRL.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree. Thanks for your thoughts, I really appreciate you taking the time to share them. I look forward to that expanded version if it ever does get released.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Just heard the verdicts. May grind my back teeth to nubs from shock, and disgust. Waiting on your next post here. Just don't understand.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Diane you misuse of the Hare is startling. Dr Hare himself has stepped back from it's use because of the way untrained people are misusing it. What you have done here is to propogAte the myth of the psychopath. Leave it to the pros.

    By the way, where is your take on a jury that looked beyond the hyperbole and actually took it's job seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is OT - I am heartbroken… I am stunned that this jury discarded all the lesser charged options and basically have set this psychopath free. I am disgusted that Baez had the arrogance to publicly declare that this was justice for Caylee. Did the jury have no understanding of the definition of reasonable doubt? Did they think any doubt was equivalent?

    As everyone knows, trials are won or lost in jury selection. While I do think that Judge Perry is a stellar jurist, I believe that he rushed the jury selection process in a significant way. Because he is also the chief administrative judge his role and responsibilities encompass the financial constraints and considerations involved in the costs incurred with 2 weeks in Pinellas County. He also had to contend with the small window of time that he was allotted for use of their court room. Just as a comparable reference the Scott Peterson case took 11 weeks to seat the jury. You have an enormous amount of criminal trial experience, what do you think about this?

    I do wonder why 4 members of Casey’s jury have criminal records. Why would they have been selected by the Prosecution? I do remember that they were running out of jury pool candidates and also the time deadline was fast looming. I do not place any blame on the Prosecution because I think that they’re hands were tied. I do think that it was very unwise for Judge Perry to have such an arbitrary deadline fixed for this most all important process.

    Juror #3 said: "You can't punish someone for something if you don't know what they did."

    Juror #3, it was NOT YOUR JOB to PUNISH Casey Anthony. It WAS your JOB to LISTEN TO THE EVIDENCE and USE COMMON SENSE. You were not handing down PUNISHMENT in this phase. Did you skim over the words "Caylee is Dead" on the Juror Instruction sheet?

    Juror #3, Ms. Ford spoke on Nightline last night. Ms. Ford felt that one could not convict if you didn't know how someone died or the motive.

    I totally disagree. You don't need to know a motive. You don't need to know how someone died. It's my opinion that often times people don't realize that behavior is evidence, powerful evidence.

    She stated that the prosecution did not provide the jury with those facts. She also stated that she did not believe the defense case. On the Nightline show, she completely sidestepped the evidence of the duct tape on Caylee's skull. She never addressed it.

    I can’t believe what some of these jurors believed! Juror #2 stated that “it didn’t matter at what point in time she came home and found out her daughter missing”. I can’t believe it. They also said they weren’t sure who the caretaker was. How in the world did this happen? Were they sleeping when the PT told in detail the calls from Cindy to Casey asking where they were? She kept making excuses as to where Caylee was. We all know this, CLEARLY Casey was the “caregiver” (term used loosely).

    ReplyDelete
  13. Part 2


    This is unreal…..they thought Casey came home and found out Caylee was missing??????????? This tells me they could not have been paying attention at all.
    Done is done but JP made a huge mistake not telling the jurors they had to disregard the opening statement from Baez as he proved none of it. This jury believed it with not one iota of proof but disregarded the evidence the PT had.
    How did 12 people agree Casey “came home and found out Caylee was missing”? It’s like one of them made it up and they all went along with it….they gave no thought whatsoever to the 31 days. What a huge huge mistake these people made by not taking the time to ask questions and look at evidence, and most of all, use common sense.

    I think this jury was totally taken in by the CSI effect. They were unable to make any type of conclusion about Casey’s post-incident behavior and wanted all the evidence tied up for them in a neat package. IMO, that's what the CSI effect is. They wanted to know when she died, where she died and how she died before they were willing to convict on any charge. It shows us a jury that is unable to analyze evidentiary behavior critically, and come to a conclusion about it. This jury also rejected the prosecution's motive that was presented to them. I believe they rejected it because they didn't understand it.

    Even though Casey Anthony lied to every person in her immediate orbit, law enforcement officers, the general public and beyond about having a job, what she was doing and when, having a "Zanny the nanny" and a kidnapping, that behavior by Casey was rejected by the jury as having any weight as evidence that a crime had been committed. They basically said, Casey Anthony's post incident behavior means nothing without a motive or cause of death.

    Even though the prosecution presented strong evidence that there was a dead body and high traces of chloroform in the trunk of Casey Anthony's car, they still could not come to the conclusion that a dead body had been placed inside it. Even though the prosecution presented powerful evidence that three pieces of duct tape were attached to the child's skull, mandible and hair, the jury did not see that as evidence that a crime had taken place. Many of us are wondering what person in their right mind could think that how and where little Caylee ended up, in plastic bags, in a swamp, with duct tape wrapped around her head was the result of an "accident?" To me, this tells me that this juror, and most likely the rest of the jurors were unable to connect the dots and put the pieces of evidence together.

    When you have jurors that are unable to make reasonable conclusions about post-incident behavior and powerful scientific evidence this is the type of verdict you get.

    The jurors, IMO are accountable to society for their actions. As they step forward to give their reasons for their utterly incredible verdict and reap financial benefits for speaking, they become fair game for investigation. They let a murderer, a psychopath free onto society!

    Here is the real Juror #3, she has a lot in common with Casey, they both like to write bad checks.
    http://www.pcsoweb.com/InmateBooking/SubjectResults.aspx?id=1410423

    ReplyDelete
  14. I bought your book a while back - before the verdict. I guess she did get away with it after all. I think the chapter of what most likely happened is spot on. IMO the jury wanted to go home. They had their own fantasy trial in their heads. It is my right to think they are idiots, right?
    I'm enjoying the book even though sadly I know the ending now. Nancy (in Austin...we're practically neighbors I see!)

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts with Thumbnails